Local scientists have contributed to a "major genetic study of the history" of peoples who lived in the Iberian Peninsula over 4,000 and 4,500 years ago.
A statement from the Government said:
The largest study to date of ancient DNA from the Iberian Peninsula offers new insights into the populations that lived in this region over the last 8,000 years. The most startling discovery suggests that local Y chromosomes were almost completely replaced during the Bronze Age.
The work is published online in Science on the 15th March, by a 111-person international team led by researchers at Harvard Medical School and the Institute of Evolutionary Biology in Barcelona, Spain. The Gibraltar team, participating in the project are Clive Finlayson, Geraldine Finlayson, Stewart Finlayson and Francisco Giles Guzman. Two Gibraltar institutions are represented in the paper: The Gibraltar National Museum and the Institute of Life and Earth Sciences of The University of Gibraltar.
“This is the first time that we have published Ancient Human DNA from Gibraltar,” said Professor Clive Finlayson. “It is really exciting to be involved in this cutting edge work.”
Three Gibraltar Bronze Age males, dated to between 2,000 and 1,500 B.C. and included in the study, have no close familiar relationships but have a very similar ancestry makeup to other Bronze Age samples from the Iberian Peninsula. Starting in 2,500 B.C. and continuing for about 500 years, the analyses indicate tumultuous social events played out that reshaped Iberians' paternal ancestry continuing to today.
“This is one of the strongest pieces of evidence in ancient-DNA research of sex bias in the prehistoric period,” said Iñigo Olalde, a postdoctoral fellow in the lab of David Reich at Harvard Medical School and first author of the study.
“The three Bronze Age individuals from Gibraltar were confirmed males by the genetic analysis,” commented Professor Geraldine Finlayson. “It is very likely that they had light skin and dark eyes and that they were lactose intolerant,” she added.
Some of the findings support or clarify what is known about the history and prehistory of Iberia, while others challenge them.
“It's amazing how the technology of ancient DNA, when combined with information from archaeology, anthropology, linguistics and the study of historical records, can bring the past to life,” said Reich, professor of genetics in the HMS Blavatnik Institute, an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and co-senior author of the study.
The team analyzed genomes from 403 ancient Iberians who lived between about 6,000 B.C. and 1,600 A.D., 975 ancient people from outside Iberia and about 2,900 present-day people. These included an individual who lived in Gibraltar around 5,400 B.C. and three who lived in Gibraltar between 2,000 and 1,500 B.C. “It is unbelievable what new technology is doing. I would never have guessed, when we were excavating these individuals over ten years ago, that we would be talking about their DNA today,” said Fran Giles, archaeologist and Senior Scientific Officer at the Gibraltar National Museum.
271 of the ancient Iberian genomes (including those from Gibraltar) had not been published before. Nearly two-thirds came from skeletons no older than 2,000 B.C., boosting by 25 times the number of publicly available genomes from this relatively recent period.
As far back as 2,500 B.C., the researchers found, Iberians began living alongside people who moved in from central Europe and carried recent genetic ancestry from the Russian steppe. Within a few hundred years, analyses showed, the two groups had extensively interbred.
To the researchers’ surprise, men and women from the two groups contributed strikingly unequal proportions of DNA to subsequent generations.
Before the central Europeans moved in, Iberians had no detectable recent ancestry from outside the Iberian Peninsula. After 2,000 B.C., 40 percent of Iberians' overall ancestors and 100 percent of their patrilineal ancestors—that is, their father and their father’s father and so forth—could be traced to the incoming groups from central Europe.
“The results were astonishing,” said Carles Lalueza-Fox, a regular contributor at the Gibraltar Calpe conferences, principal investigator of the Paleogenomics Lab at the Institute of Evolutionary Biology and co-senior author of the study. “The data suggest there was a major genetic change that is not obvious from the archaeological record."
What could have instigated such a dramatic turnover is not yet clear.
“It would be a mistake to jump to the conclusion that Iberian men were killed or forcibly displaced," said Olalde, "as the archaeological record gives no clear evidence of a burst of violence in this period."
One alternative possibility is that local Iberian women preferred the central European newcomers in a context of “strong social stratification,” said Lalueza-Fox.
Other fields such as archaeology and anthropology need to be brought to bear to gain insight into what shaped these genetic patterns," said Reich.
Our study offers a change in perspective and invites people to look at the archaeological record again with different eyes,” said Lalueza-Fox
Analyzing additional samples from this time period—the researchers had about 60—could provide greater detail about the genetic turnover or reveal that Y chromosomes shifted less in some populations or regions of Iberia than others.
As the centuries passed, paternal ancestry continued to evolve, the team found. Still, most present-day Iberian men can trace their paternal ancestry to these Bronze Age newcomers.
A slice through time
Other findings included:
• Groups of hunter-gatherers scattered across Iberia had markedly different genetic makeup from one another in the Mesolithic era, from about 8,000 B.C. to 5,500 B.C., suggesting that new groups of hunter-gatherers migrated to Iberia and transformed local populations before farmers arrived with their own distinct ancestry from Anatolia (present-day Turkey). The Gibraltar individual from 5,400 B.C., fits into this pattern. Stewart Finlayson of the Gibraltar National Museum, and a co-author of the paper said, “The genetics shows her to be female. Her ancestry is most similar to other Early Neolithic samples from Iberia and not to later Middle Neolithic individuals, with ~90% of her ancestry related to Neolithic populations from Anatolia and 10% of ancestry related to Mesolithic Europeans. We also know that she too was lactose intolerant, like everybody during her time.”
• One person buried in Iberia between 2,400 B.C. and 2,000 B.C. had entirely North African ancestry, and a second person who lived between 2,000 B.C. and 1,600 B.C. had a grandparent with North African ancestry. Researchers have known that the two regions engaged in trade at that time; the new study confirms that people also moved from Africa to Europe.
• Samples from Iron Age people who lived around 900 B.C. to 19 B.C. in areas where very different languages were spoken, all had significant ancestry from the Russian steppe. This suggests that influxes of people did not always spark linguistic changes, specifically the adoption of Indo-European languages, the study authors said.
• Modern-day Basques are similar genetically to Iron Age people throughout the Iberian Peninsula, leading the researchers to hypothesize that Basque ancestry and language remained relatively intact in the intervening millennia while other groups around them mixed and more significantly changed.
• North African ancestry was more widespread in Iberia during the Roman period (about 20 B.C. to 400 A.D.) than previously appreciated, especially in the south - the genetic influences occurred well before Tarik ibn-Zeyad landed in Gibraltar in 711 A.D., starting the North African conquest of Iberia.
Minister for Ministry of Education, Heritage, Environment, Energy and Climate Change, the Hon John Cortes said, ‘“Once again the work of the Gibraltar National Museum is at the forefront of international research. We are all proud of that and particularly of the relevance that our prehistory has in piecing together our past.”